OK, have t2 installed as a virtual client on Fedora12-Beta

Building t2-trunk now.

Building glibc takes about 10 minutes - much better than 4 hrs.

Parallel build using 2 jobs

On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 10:07 -0600, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> Yes, I noticed that my 2nd patch file did not work after I reloaded
> glibc and did svn update. Inspecting the configure file showed that it
> already had the changes and the patch file could not find the old
> patterns.
> 
> My sister's old laptop takes about 4 hrs 2 min 3 sec to build glibc..
> 
> Masochistic. I need to get my virtual box configured.
> 
> Bob G
> 
> On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 09:17 +0200, Mika Pesu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for testing and modifying the upstream patch. From the svn log i 
> > noticed that René commited some binutils patch for glibc:
> > Commit by *rene* :: r*34767* /trunk/package/base/glibc/ 
> > (any-cc-ok.patch.cross binutils-22.patch):
> > 
> >     * fixed glibc/configure for the new binutils version
> > 
> > Look's like it's fixed now at svn.
> > 
> > -Mika
> > 
> > 
> > Bob Gustafson kirjoitti:
> > > As one who has a little free time, I did some cut and paste from the git
> > > page you referenced. And then discovered that the git listing seems to
> > > add an additional line return and two leading spaces (or something like
> > > that) to each line listed.
> > >
> > > I did a manual edit of the two files and then successfully compiled
> > > glibc. This does not mean that my keystrokes are correct.. Looking at
> > > the upstream patch, I think I like your patch files better. The
> > > selection regex looks a little more consistent than the upstream patch.
> > >
> > > If anyone is interested, I have attached the two patch files. They could
> > > be dropped into directory package/base/glibc
> > >
> > > Bob G
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 20:21 +0200, Mika Pesu wrote:
> > >   
> > >> Hi list,
> > >>
> > >> The recent update of binutils broke glibc, because glibc fails to 
> > >> recognize ld --version that comes from binutils.
> > >>
> > >> With some git browsing i found the upstream commit to fix it, here's the 
> > >> link: 
> > >> http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=0549ce8ec1f66a41c59815e50dd48ffd74fabb52;hp=6dfeb5245bca9f2ef94815ed9a7b979a9e0be744
> > >>
> > >> I havent yet tryed the upstream patch, but if someone with free time 
> > >> could test it.
> > >>
> > >> Attached is my local patch for glibc, but i guess upstream fix could be 
> > >> better one.
> > >>
> > >> -Mika
> > >> plain text document attachment (binutils_recognize_for_glibc.patch)
> > >> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> > >> index 7555891..fdfbd2d 100755
> > >> --- a/configure
> > >> +++ b/configure
> > >> @@ -4839,7 +4839,7 @@ $as_echo_n "checking version of $AS... " >&6; }
> > >>    ac_prog_version=`$AS --version 2>&1 | sed -n 's/^.*GNU assembler.* 
> > >> \([0-9]*\.[0-9.]*\).*$/\1/p'`
> > >>    case $ac_prog_version in
> > >>      '') ac_prog_version="v. ?.??, bad"; ac_verc_fail=yes;;
> > >> -    2.1[3-9]*)
> > >> +    2.1[3-9]*|[2-9].[2-9]*)
> > >>         ac_prog_version="$ac_prog_version, ok"; ac_verc_fail=no;;
> > >>      *) ac_prog_version="$ac_prog_version, bad"; ac_verc_fail=yes;;
> > >>  
> > >> @@ -4902,7 +4902,7 @@ $as_echo_n "checking version of $LD... " >&6; }
> > >>    ac_prog_version=`$LD --version 2>&1 | sed -n 's/^.*GNU ld.* 
> > >> \([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9.]*\).*$/\1/p'`
> > >>    case $ac_prog_version in
> > >>      '') ac_prog_version="v. ?.??, bad"; ac_verc_fail=yes;;
> > >> -    2.1[3-9]*)
> > >> +    2.1[3-9]*|[2-9].[2-9]*)
> > >>         ac_prog_version="$ac_prog_version, ok"; ac_verc_fail=no;;
> > >>      *) ac_prog_version="$ac_prog_version, bad"; ac_verc_fail=yes;;
> > >>  
> > >> diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
> > >> index d54e952..05c396a 100644
> > >> --- a/configure.in
> > >> +++ b/configure.in
> > >> @@ -897,10 +897,10 @@ AC_SUBST(MIG)dnl Needed by 
> > >> sysdeps/mach/configure.in
> > >>  # Accept binutils 2.13 or newer.
> > >>  AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(AS, $AS, --version,
> > >>                    [GNU assembler.* \([0-9]*\.[0-9.]*\)],
> > >> -                  [2.1[3-9]*], AS=: critic_missing="$critic_missing as")
> > >> +                  [2.1[3-9]*|[2-9].[2-9]*], AS=: 
> > >> critic_missing="$critic_missing as")
> > >>  AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(LD, $LD, --version,
> > >>                    [GNU ld.* \([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9.]*\)],
> > >> -                  [2.1[3-9]*], LD=: critic_missing="$critic_missing ld")
> > >> +                  [2.1[3-9]*|[2-9].[2-9]*], LD=: 
> > >> critic_missing="$critic_missing ld")
> > >>  
> > >>  # We need the physical current working directory.  We cannot use the
> > >>  # "pwd -P" shell builtin since that's not portable.  Instead we try to
> > >>
> > >>     
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------- 
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2



----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2

Reply via email to