Porting the MIPS bits in dietlibc to 64 bit may only take some hours of trial and error. In fact I may even do so the next days (donations welcome :-). You could mark dietlibc [R] - mips64 temporarily (in it's .desc).
I have a local mips64 glibc fix that i am just test build to check regressions and hope to commit any minute. René Sent abroad - http://ExactCODE.com Germany. On Sep 23, 2010, at 18:51, Jan Rovins <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Rene for reviewing & committing pieces of that big patch. > > I am starting to work again on the current trunk, just to see what will build > for Mips64. > would like to have the embedded, embedded-minimal, and generic-minimal > buildable for mips64 > Right now, the biggest show stopper is dietlibc. I don't think it will be > ported to mips64 any time soon, so is there a way to leave it out of the > package list conditionally, when we are building a Mips64 target? > > Jan > > > On 9/23/2010 9:21 AM, Rene Rebe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sep 8, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Jan Rovins wrote: >> >>> <mips64-T2-R36064.patch> >> >> Applied reworked tcl cross compile glue: >> >>> Index: package/base/tcl/tcl.desc >>> =================================================================== >>> --- package/base/tcl/tcl.desc (revision 36064) >>> +++ package/base/tcl/tcl.desc (working copy) >>> @@ -26,9 +26,10 @@ >>> >>> [C] extra/development extra/tool extra/shell >> > >>> +[F] CROSS >> ... >> >>> + #JLR ? do we need seperate include paths for cross& non cross builds? >>> + # or can $root$includedir work for native builds too? >> Yes, we can! >> >>> +strtod_fix () { >>> + export ac_cv_func_strtod=yes >>> + export tcl_cv_strtod_buggy=1 >>> +} >>> + >>> +if ! atstage native; then >>> + hook_add preconf 4 strtod_fix >>> +fi >> This can also be done more elegantly, see: >> >> Committed revision 37666. >> >> René >> >
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
