Hi,
On 03.02.2011, at 00:04, Jan Rovins wrote:
> On 2/2/2011 4:22 AM, René Rebe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I was visiting my parents last weekend I took my Sgi Octane from the
>> attic, it even still powers up, yay! I hope to find the time to finalize the
>> dietlibc mips64 port during one of the next weekends, ...
>>
> That is good news.
>
> I had to pin my Mips64 T2 tree to a snapshot from early January (Jan 4th or
> something like that) because the stuff using the new dietlibc would not
> successfully link under mips64. In addition to that, the move to GCC 4.5.2 is
> giving internal compiler errors when building the stage1 GCC :-(. GCC 4.5.1
> is still working fine.
While most dietlibc stuff was intended to build and link I now fixed the
trunk:HEAD mips64 dietlibc breakage I could spot.
Will fix the startup / syscall code for the dietlibc mips64 port soon.
René
> Jan
>
>
>> René
>>
>> On 28.10.2010, at 23:00, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We need to fix dietlibs for mips64 for real, too - maybe time to get an Sgi
>>> O2 from eBay (or ask my parents to bring the Octane to Berlin on my 30th
>>> birthday this Saturday, 'though it was quite loud, bulky and heavy, ...)
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Will review / apply the patches soon, any reason you duplicated the whole
>>> gcc.confirm int the architecture package directory?
>>>
>>> René
>>>
>>> Sent abroad - http://ExactCODE.com Germany.
>>>
>>> On Oct 27, 2010, at 21:11, Jan Rovins<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rene,
>>>>
>>>> Here are the last 3 patches that are needed for "generic minimal" to build
>>>> on Mips64.
>>>>
>>>> Since you mentioned that the latest GCC was also failing for you while
>>>> building e2fsprogs, I am including the patch to roll back to GCC 4.4.3.
>>>>
>>>> With these patches, the 9.0 branch will cross build Mips64, I will also
>>>> consider back-porting all the Mips64 fixes to the 8.0 branch, if you are
>>>> planning to do an 8.1 release.
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/30/2010 6:07 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Jan Rovins wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/28/2010 3:18 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi again,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it built here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10847302 Sep 25 11:34
>>>>>>> build/cross-mips64-9.0-trunk-generic-mips64-EB-cross-linux/var/adm/logs/1-gcc.log
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While usually building 64bit binaries on 32bit system was (and should)
>>>>>>> not a problem, there certainly can be something in that distribution
>>>>>>> that poses a problem, ... :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> René
>>>>>> Yes, Probability something specific about building on 32-bit Suse
>>>>>> SLES-11, To move forward, I had to roll back to GCC 4.4.3.
>>>>>> Eventually I would like to set up a T2 host, or at least somthing more
>>>>>> compatable for cross building T2, but am currently short of time&
>>>>>> fast machines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking back at the GCC 4.5.0 compiler failure back in May, that was an
>>>>>> internal compiler error while building e2fsprogs on Ubuntu 9.10,
>>>>>> GCC 4.5.0 Built OK at stage 1 in that situation.
>>>>> indeed, in my trunk (built on a x86_64 t2/trunk) e2fsprogs get's the
>>>>> cross gcc to an internal compiler error (ICE), ...
>>>>>
>>>>> René
>>>> <mips64-svn.patch>
>>>> <mips64-gcc-4.4.3.patch>
>>>> <mips64-e2fsprog.patch>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>> [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>
--
René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
