Hey all, On 15.03.2012, at 05:37, girish gulawani wrote:
> Hello Jan. > Thanks very much for the detailed information on every point!!! Mips64 would be more tested, if I had a mips64 machine that is fun, my Octane is just too loud to keep running in the office (or at home), ... But I do not need any silicon, sending patches along is generally nice (tm) was well :-) >> Dietlib was hard coded into many of the projects, I found a way to > undo this for most of them, but the embedded-utils needed for the > initrd was impossible to split from dietlib without a major > re-write. > > > If you don't mind can you share some ways' to skip Dietlib? Because in my > case the initrd is not exactly a problem (for the busybox is working), so the > embed-utils part can be skipped over. There are even architectures without dietlibc support, superh, and whatnot, ... you only need to touch the initrd stuff al ittle, as it relies on statically compiled binaries for the initrd, ... > I'm trying to check the Dietlib port. Hope i don't have to give up midway and > run behind making it full-fat Glibc/Newlib :( Wasn't newlib for freestanding stuff without OS kernel? What architecture are you targeting? Greetings, -- René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin http://exactcode.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
