Hey,
no problem - unlike the Linux kernel folks who are quite annoying to get
patches accept - I basically ever just parsed anything thrown at me, ...
Just occasionally reminding howto send more optimal, ...
Yes, you can run svn diff in any dir, or specifying it explicitly like:
svn di some/dir/foo/bar
Well, the NSA or other evil hackers intercept, modify or break-in
everywhere.
The checksum at least tells us I or others get the same source the
original package submitter did, ...
Occasionally we even catch projects altering the files after the
release, themselves, sigh.
This old checksum is too insecure, however - for some time I'm already
thinking to bump that to sha-whatever.
René
On 04/24/2016 05:04 PM, scsijon wrote:
sorry,
But, i've been sending to you this way specifically for a while now,
as if I sent you a svn diff you'd end up with a whole lot of puppy
specific stuff you don't need or want in T2. I missed the new checksum
change. I wonder if svn diff can be tied to a directory, then I could
send changes that way.
Never thought NSA would be playing with the international address used
as they just usually have it set for if_in_USA_then_use_this_version
type of thing.
regards from Australia
scsijon
On 04/25/2016 02:10 AM, René Rebe wrote:
Hi,
yeah - well, I'm recently not too interested in Qt ;-)
Thanks, and applied.
If you want to do it even more awesome for the next patch:
1. send a patch (svn diff, ...) so I see the changes immediately, ...
2. send it with the Checksum so that we can be sure we both got the same
sources (and not the NSA tweak, ...).
Greetings from Berlin,
René
On 04/22/2016 07:48 AM, scsijon wrote:
Rene, attached a qt5.desc for qt v5.6.0 as T2 has currently 5.3.2
which is well out of the loop now.
5.6.x has been certified as stable long term so will be around for a
while.
regards
jonw
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
