Hi,
while I really try to accept any kind of input, files, tarballs, … as all
developer I would prefer diffs aka patches.
Could you in the future attach or inline "svn diff" of files you change so I do
not need to save the file to my local tree and svn diff it myself to see any
change?
Thanks so much,
René
> On 5. Feb 2020, at 10:07, scsijon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 1-
>
> Fixes for llvm are attached, one is the .desc change mentioned below to not
> build at stage0, and 2 changes for the .conf so it only builds dynamic and
> not partly dynamic / partly static libs, and a fix for the comment in the
> same line to make it clearer why needed.
>
> 2-
>
> a) In target/generic/pkgsel/40-minimal-xorg.in 'markupsafe' and 'mako' have
> been apparently relaced within 'meson', i've disabled mine for now until I
> can do a full independant build.
>
> b) In target/generic/pkgsel/40-minimal-xorg.in, a number of other deps are
> missing and are now needed to be added, they are xproto, fontsproto,
> xf86driproto, inputproto, glproto, pyopengl, and fontutil.
>
> and that's todays work as it's building stage 5 at present!
>
> regards
> scsijon
>
>
> On 05/02/20 14:25, scsijon wrote:
>> On 05/02/20 01:06, scsijon wrote:
>>>
>>> first two things found with 40-minimal-xorg added
>>>
>>> go into develop/intltool/intltool.desc and change 0----5--- to -----5--- as
>>> intltool wants the perl module xmlparser and that's not built till '5' and
>>> perl itself built in '2'. Can't see it needed in earlier stages anyway.
>>>
>>> i've also turned off llvm as it's failing wanting stuff that's musl/clang
>>> only, maybe there is a switch missing with glib/gcc since they went that
>>> route. I'll look at it when I get to that point of needing it as we don't
>>> use it in quirky.
>>>
>> Interesting, i've got to the 5-$package stage with llvm off and of course
>> xorg-server failed as it wants it. And now having added it back on (X ilo O)
>> it seems to be building ok, at least it's up to 73% and still going strong,
>> I wonder if llvm shouldn't be set not as 01---5---9 but -1---5---9 ? I shall
>> try when I start a fresh rebuild and see what happens and report back.
>> By the way, there are a few missing dependancies in 4-minimal-xorg and
>> apparently with meson included a couple of others are no longer needed.
>> I really wish they hadn't played with the old
>> <.configure ; make ; make test ; make install>
>> routine. Just because they couldn't write a decent configure script we have
>> to put up with all this extra 'stuff' to learn and have to use!
>>> scsijon
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/02/20 17:46, scsijon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just a quick note that I had a sucessfull 20-minimal build using r49158
>>>> and patches / fixes, which failed again when updated to r49191, even
>>>> though I added the fixes, so i've gone back to r49158 and trying by adding
>>>> to 40-minimal-xorg as I will be diverting after this point. When it's
>>>> right at 40-minimal-xorg i'll start updating revisions.
>>>>
>>>> Yet to add a full info sheet and attach's, that will happen after a 'few'
>>>> cleanup's and something that others can use, it's a bit cryptic at
>>>> present, I can understand it but most others won't.
>>>>
>>>> I'm also back to using this thread rather than a new one for the
>>>> 40-minimal-xorg or mixing things up by using Jans.
>>>>
>>>> scsijon
>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to
>> unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>> [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
> <llvm.desc><llvm.conf>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
--
ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin, https://exactcode.com
https://exactscan.com | https://ocrkit.com | https://t2sde.org |
https://rene.rebe.de
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
