I am seeing red messages even though it is a successful start because
tac_plus is sending message to a wrong log level or it does not have proper
systemd implementation?
*●* tacacs@cc.service - TACACS+ daemon instance tacacs-cc
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/tacacs@.service; enabled; vendor
preset: disabled)
Active: *active (running)* since Fri 2018-02-09 04:02:22 UTC; 13h ago
Docs: man:tac_plus(8)
man:tac_plus.conf(5)
Process: 15379 ExecReload=/bin/sh -c /home/audit/bin/tacsanity
/etc/tacacs/tacacs-%i.conf && /bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID (code=exited,
status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 18131 (tac_plus)
CGroup: /system.slice/system-tacacs.slice/tacacs@cc.service
└─18131 /usr/local/sbin/tac_plus -G -L -B 100.75.8.233 -C
/etc/tacacs/tacacs-cc.conf -l /var/log/tacacs/tacacs-cc.daemon.log -p 49 -d
8 -d 16
Feb 09 17:32:21 tacacs.example.net systemd[1]: Reloaded TACACS+ daemon
instance tacacs-cc.
Feb 09 17:32:21 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[18131]: Received signal
Feb 09 17:32:21 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[18131]: Version F4.0.4.28
Initialized 3
Feb 09 17:32:49 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[15392]: *Attempting to lock
/tmp/tmp.9YI9LTwhGc.log fd 3*
Feb 09 17:32:49 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[15392]: *Successfully locked
/tmp/tmp.9YI9LTwhGc.log fd 3 after 1 tries*
Feb 09 17:32:49 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[15392]: Reading config
Feb 09 17:32:50 tacacs.example.net systemd[1]: Reloaded TACACS+ daemon
instance tacacs-cc.
Feb 09 17:32:50 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[18131]: Received signal
Feb 09 17:32:50 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[18131]: Reading config
Feb 09 17:32:50 tacacs.example.net tac_plus[18131]: Version F4.0.4.28
Initialized 4
Also journalctl -o export _SYSTEMD_UNIT=tacacs@cc.service -e does show only
those two lines are using syslog priority 3 (error) and hence
the red.
Trying to see what's the reason behind picking priority 3 (error) for these
two lines, instead of priority 5 (notice) or priority 6 (info) like rest of
the messages in there?
Attempting to lock ....
Successfully locked ...
Thanks
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/tac_plus/attachments/20180209/893ebfe2/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
tac_plus mailing list
tac_plus@shrubbery.net
http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/tac_plus
