Wow... an "A"... Are we really supporting Safari all around? :D
As for release names, I'd stick with the beta-2 name, at least for
tacos4, and leave the new numbering scheme for the trunk. Don't you
think is more consistent? Or else maybe people will start wondering
where did the betas go?
Don't you think?
my 2 cents,
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
A beta-2 release sounds like a fine idea to me. We should say then
that new major new features should be made to anything core and public
facing until the next release. (unless they are non-documented
features/bugfixes/etc..) .
As for the release naming conventions I don't have a problem with
moving over to something more like beta 4.0.2 if you guys want. It
seems that this is where tapestry is moving anyways.
P.S. It's good to see that tacos is being listed as one of the "good
guys" :)
P.P.S. Feel free Andreas.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Tacos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tacos-devel
