Hi, Anthony wrote: >>> If you can outline a perimeter, you don't need a relation.
>> Care to elaborate? > The elements which are within the perimeter can be calculated from the > perimeter itself. We tend to explicitly tag whether something belongs to the site or not. You might, for example, have a bridge spanning the site or other kinds of "transit routes" that are not part of the site, but serve to travel through/across the site without entering it. A rule like the one you suggested would make that impossible. > It's redundant to have the same information > expressed twice, and doing so will only lead to conflicting data. The relation would express whether something is logically part of the site; the geometry would express whether something covers the same ground as the site. This is not the same information. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
