On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM, James Livingston <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a > bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For > example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you often can't walk your > horse as well as not riding it. > But if horse=no is on an expressway, that probably doesn't mean you can't carry your horse in a horse trailer. I would think horse=no means you can't ride your horse, and whether or not you can walk your horse is a separate issue. I'm not an expert in horse laws, but I bet that's the way the law is here where I live, too. If you can walk your dog, then why not your horse or your bike? http://hamsterprophet.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/a-small-horse-3.jpeg
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
