On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote:
> In Australia, we ARE tagging paths generally with "unknown (or no) > legal status". Should we *guess* the legal status and use > footway/cycleway etc., or use highway=path + surface + width? > > Or ignore the legal status entirely and map on the basis of common practice. Why was "legal status" chosen as the most important attribute to map? Surely what matters most is whether or not you should use a certain path, regardless of what the "legal status" is. (Hopefully I'll find some example where it's "illegal" to walk/ride somewhere, but everyone does it.) Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
