Personally - and I'm probably wrong! - I had always thought that foot / bicycle = yes / no etc. did not say anything one way or the other about formal legal status (hence leaving this to designation= ) but merely whether the evidence on the ground (whether signage - which may or may not have strictly legal significance - or physical condition or even local custom) suggested that the way was appropriate for the user group concerned. So - question to the group - do people think that foot / bicycle / etc. = yes / no / permissive etc. has any strictly legal implication in their area / usage? Mike Harris
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Mann Sent: 08 December 2009 09:57 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no Are we edging towards: bicycle=yes|no|private|permissive|unknown - legal status designation=* - your local (national) name for the legal status bicycle:defacto=prevented|forbidden|tolerated|discouraged|accepted|supported |established - the apparent practical status, which you can use or not use, depending on your personal standards of verifiability (and the evidence available) Richard No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.710 / Virus Database: 270.14.98/2552 - Release Date: 12/08/09 07:34:00
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
