On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Information about tag support is a *good* thing, not a bad one. I now > realise that Mapnik doesn't recognise *any* sport=* tags, but that's not > going to stop me using them. But it will make me be careful to always use it > with a tag that it *does* support as well. See how this is beneficial?
I don't see how this is beneficial. As others have said, it just encourages tagging for the *current implementation of* the renderer, as opposed to tagging with a long-term view. I strongly think taggers should not be influenced by the current implementation of a handful of renderers. This yes/no information may be beneficial, however, to those wanting to improve renderer style files, i.e. to see which features they have yet to consider rendering. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
