On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Jonathan Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > Erik Johansson wrote: >> Yes but people say "don't tag for the renderer" which a horrible meme, >> I say "always tag for the renderer". If there is not visual >> feedbackyou are doing it wrong (except in keepright).
> Only using a tag because it appears in a renderer style sheet (or > conversely not using one just because it doesn't) is a pretty good > definition of "tagging for the renderer". Well, I might admit I'm taking an extreme view, but you are flying high on abstractions. That's the problem with the "Don't tag for the renderer", too abstract. leisure=golf_course: bunker: natural=beach water: natural=water start point (tee?): highway=pedestrian If I did this I would get something rendered on the map, instant feedback and it would be a pretty good representation of what was there. or from the blog post: k:golf; v:fairway k:golf; v:green k:golf; v:bunker k:golf; v:tee # added in the same spirit. or a mix reposting links: OSM data link: http://osm.org/go/z...@96qqby--?layers=b000ftt Blog posts with rendering: http://weait.com/content/golf-course-style-openstreetmap OSM rendering: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.730833&lon=-78.847606&zoom=18 /emj _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
