Chris Hill wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: >> I'd tag a section marked as "cyclists must dismount" as a footway, >> bicycle=destination (since there's no way in hell you'd want to take a >> route that bogus as anything but a last resort). > > Except that in Hull, UK two of the National Cycle Network routes (1 & > 65) share a footpath with a 'Cyclists Dismount' sign [1]. It makes good > sense as it keeps cyclists off the otherwise very busy main roads into > the city centre. I'd push my bike a short way to gain that benefit.
I wouldn't tag for the routing engine on this one: You can't ride through it, so it's effectively bicycle=destination even if it is part of the NCN. I'd rather follow a legal path that I don't have to get off than follow a numbered route created by a moron. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
