On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Matthias Julius <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, what is steep then? 15% or more?
I personally don't care, because I won't use it. Ask a civil engineer or look at some regulations and choose something meaningful? >>> I would say all the incline tags should be moved to the ways. >> >> As Anthony said, this isn't equivalent, unless it's moved to a new way >> with infinitesimal length. > > or to a relation that indicates that a way has an incline at a certain > node. You could call this overkill, of course, but it has the advantage > to be more robust when the data is changed, especially when another way > is added to that node. Hmm that's true. This is a very similar idea to the proposed Relation:type=stop, i.e. using a way to indicate direction, and a node to indicate location - and a relation to link the two (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop) I think Relation:type=stop is an ok idea - so, not surprisingly, I think your Relation:type=incline idea is also ok. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
