On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Nop <[email protected]> wrote: > According to these hints, cyclists will tag even more minor roads, >
I did say "and cannot be used by cars." but I probably should have made that more clear. A road is never a cycleway. > pedestrian ways If it's a pedestrian way which is "especially suitable for cycling", then that's a good thing. If it's a short path between two buildings or something, I wouldn't call that "especially suitable for cycling". > and agricultural tracks Again, if vehicles are allowed, it would never be a cycleway. Sorry for the confusion. And to reiterate, I haven't specified what the minimum standard would be exactly. If you're concerned that there would be "too many" cycleways mapped in your area, then I think the standard *in your area* should be raised. It is not important that a single piece of tarmac be mapped the same way in every country. The important bit is to point out useful information to cyclists - and labelling every single pedestrian path as a cycleway would clearly be wrong. Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
