Liz wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> d) I don't think it's a good idea to change a tag description two years >> after it was documented, because the wording is "slightly" wrong for >> some parts of the english speaking world. Because doing so is an >> annoyance for anyone involved and the wording will always be slightly >> wrong for someone. Not to mention that a lot of people won't >> notice/ignore any changes here, as these definitions are "old enough" in >> OSM terms. My approach: Stick to the wiki definitions even if you don't >> like it and go on mapping :-) >> >> > > We need to be able to say "a mistake has been made, these tags need revision" > and do something about mistakes. > If we don't have a process for dealing with errors in tag choice and > translation we will have a massive pile of junk data (and then no-one will > care about the licence at all). > > +1
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
