2010/1/20 Anthony <[email protected]> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> 2010/1/20 Anthony <[email protected]> >> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Peteris Krisjanis <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> We map everything we can. >>>> >>> >>> What in the world is that supposed to mean? It's either untrue (as there >>> are plenty of things that can be mapped which aren't mapped) or begs the >>> question. >>> >> >> no, it's not untrue. It's simply not "finished" (nor will it ever be). >> > > Then it begs the question, which is what we should be mapping *today*, not > at some indefinite point in the future (or, possibly, never at all). > >
maybe I was hard to understand: *today* *you* should map what *you* want, *I* will map what *I* want, and *they* are mapping what *they* want. That's the principle. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
