On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Ulf Lamping <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... Yes, there can only be one photo to represent > the OSM object.
Why? You could just as easily use image=<img1>;<img2>;..., though this clearly doesn't scale well (which may suggest that this isn't a good approach...) I think what Tobias is getting at is that there's perhaps no "correct" value for the image=* tag. Some will see this as a bad thing, and see this as meaning that its value is not "objective". If the value of image=* for a feature is defined as "one or more images that show the feature", then I think that this is at least verifiable, in that the tag can be said to be true or false. So I don't see a huge problem - but it's not something that I'd be interested in using. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
![Re: [Tagging] tag proposal "image=http:/... .jpg"](/search?l=tagging@openstreetmap.org&q=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5BTagging%5C%5D+tag+proposal+%5C%22image%3Dhttp%5C%3A%5C%2F...+.jpg%5C%22%22&o=newest){kind=link}
