2010/2/8 Roy Wallace <[email protected]>: > Should buildings adjacent to each other be mapped: > 1) individually, with shared boundaries
+1 > 2) individually, with an arbitrarily small gap between boundaries -1, if there is no gap in reality, no shouldn't map one. > 3) as one contiguous area? -1. You can do this to be faster in the beginning, but it is less acurate, looses information, and get's less practical when you come to the point that you add additional information to some of the buildings. > to [1], which says: "For areas adjacent to ways, the consensus is to > generally leave a small gap between the area and the way instead of sharing > the boundary". What about *areas adjacent to areas*? They should share boundaries. I personally tend to draw separate polygons (boundary ways overlapping) but there is also other mappers that promote shared ways (requires MP-Relation, why I think this gets stuff more complicated in simple situations (2 common nodes)). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
