2010/2/19 Pieren <[email protected]>: > Hey, guys, come back to the real world. As you said, putting the width_est > is only helpful if you can compare it, which means that you will need a > width_est in ALL highways.
no, you can always compare it to the width of your vehicle, therefore it doesn't require that all streets are tagged width it. AND: you can always compare to the construction standards for new roads in your part of the world. BTW: in countries with a well developed and maintained road system there will always be indications (signs) for narrow parts (like the ones we are already mapping with maxwidth) with the legal binding width number on it, so no need to estimate. If a user is bad at estimating widths I suggest that he measures the exact width. Still "narrow" is not a good solution to the problem as many posters have already written above. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
