On 18 March 2010 14:27, Bill Ricker <[email protected]> wrote: > they way Massachusetts was settled, the flood prone areas tend to be > tagged Village ... > flood waters just cresting here.
The OSM deff of a villiage isn't useful in Australia, also areas of cities have been able to develop due to people in charge of things that shouldn't be and the next flood that comes along, followed by a wave of lawsuits... > just for explicit, the Personal license there grants CC-SA use, is > that compatible with old & proposed new OSM terms? If you read Nearmap terms and conditions they explicitly allow their tiles to be used for OSM, they've already been asked about the new licensing but until OSM commits to the change it isn't a pressing issue. > Here in the US there is an official federal definition of Flood Prone > line, within which flood insurance disclosure is required of > Realtors(tm). Reading a single flood line from a photo - which may not > be at crest, may be an annual, a 20year, or a 50year event, will be > very low fidelity in comparison. I was mostly after suggestions on tagging roads that are commonly subjected to flooding, rather than trying to pin down the highest flooding in a life time. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
