On 15 June 2010 13:02, Zeke Farwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the link, Dave. I've though about similar classification schemes > to what's listed there. Something like this in decreasing importance: > aerodrome = international > aerodrome = regional > aerodrome = local > The problem I see with this terminology is that it's more subjective, and > it's harder to define based on physical characteristics. A very small > airfield may in fact classified as an international airport because it > receives the occasional international flight. This doesn't mean it has the > same level of importance as Heathrow in london or JFK in the US.
Exactly, tagging things as international doesn't help. I think we would be better classifying things based on approximate air traffic per day, the number of run ways, and so no, alternatively we could just tag these things individually: air_traffic=1000 runways=10 _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
