On 26/07/2010 11:37, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Richard Mann
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Good idea, or just a local fix?

    Richard


Personnally, I think the easiest to fix many issues would be to draw a
specific polygon for the bridge and link it to the roads, cycleways,
railways, etc by a relation. I don't know for renderers but it would
make contributors live much easier. You don't split roads anymore. You
can align nodes in circle for your roundabout. You don't see gaps
between the different ways going over the same bridge, etc...

That may well be true - and indeed is *much* better for dual carriageways or other multiple ways going over bridges - but it doesn't solve the problem for the hundreds of thousands of them already out there that renderers have to deal with today. It also doesn't solve the exaggerated widths problem I mentioned.

David

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to