On 26/07/2010 12:41, Richard Welty wrote:
On 7/26/10 4:20 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 26 July 2010 18:16,<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more
precise than the old "amenity=fire_hydrant" tag and there is a very
active discussion on the German board:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=762 .
Common hydrants can be tagged in the old way, but new ones should be
use the new precise scheme.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant
Don't we have enough amenity=* already?
Why not use emergency=*?
i like emergency=*
as a way of going forward for these sorts of things.
Why? What advantages does it bring?
It's not going forward just splitting & stepping sideways.
What's wrong with have lot's of amenities?
The important thing is to make sure that we don't have one value tag to
represent different objects.
Cheers
Dave F.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
