>> What is the preferred way to handle this dual-purpose way? > > In some forms of rendering the boundary is rendered instead of the stream > and > the water feature disappears on the map. > The preferred Australian solution is to not reuse the same boundary but to > duplicate it. This allows all renderers and routers to manage the mapping, > and > sets off warnings in the duplicate nodes systems which makes some mappers > then > merge the ways again.
"Australian solution"? I'd like to think we're not applying different mapping rules to different countries! -- If you are flammable and have legs, you're never blocking a fire exit. -Mitch Hedberg _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
