On 18 August 2010 12:04, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > Which only a few diehards are ever going to tag. Ease of use for > taggers is a major consideration. More tags=more powerful information, > but less usability.
There is a lot of amenity=fast_food places tagged, I wonder how many tag the cuisine properly. In this case the name/brand alone is usually significant for people to deduce the cuisine, I'm guessing a name like "Bay City Bike" (first result on Google) would kind of give the same information. >> This is analogous to amenity=fuel and then listing the types of fuel >> sold in separate key/value pairs. We don't tag it as amenity=lpg_fuel. > > I don't see the analogy personally Well the analogy is simple, using your example that we wouldn't find any bike rental places, unless they were tagged *=bike_rental then in your view then, how would we ever find a fuel location that sells lpg fuel unless they were tagged amenity=lpg_fuel? > I said "bikes". While you might be interested in bike rental places, they aren't the most common type of rental place, and I don't see why we should have such a narrow view/approach to a common type of shop. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
