On Tuesday, August 17, 2010 08:55:48 pm, Alan Mintz wrote: > As I said somewhere earlier, this seems to vary by region and forest. The > tagging I mentioned is used in all southern and central California > USFS-oversight forests and the ones I was able to quickly check just now in > northern CA.
Very wildly… for the areas I'm dealing with: http://fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5176677.pdf use numbers (i.e. 44), while another area a bit south: http://fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5176693.pdf use T plus the number (i.e. T5004). In the shapefiles I have, trails are referred to by number only for the entire forest. AFAIK, the former trails are very old (30+ yrs?) while the latter trails are relatively new (10 yrs), if that matters. Alan, do you have a reference for the FH/FR/FT designation so I can add this to the wiki? It's frequently mentioned on the Internet, but I've not found anything particularly authoritative looking. -- Samat K Jain <http://samat.org/> | GPG: 0x4A456FBA A man said to the Universe: "Sir, I exist!" "However," replied the Universe, "the fact has not created in me a sense of obligation." -- Stephen Crane (607) -- Samat K Jain <http://samat.org/> | GPG: 0x4A456FBA God defend me from myself. -- Montaigne (165)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
