On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Simone Saviolo <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/8/26 David ``Smith'' <[email protected]>: >> * If a street has its sidewalks mapped separately, the street itself >> should probably be tagged with foot=no. > > -1. "no" is too strong: pedestrians are never forbidden to go on a > road (except for motorways, at least in Italy). Maybe something like > "not preferred", only with a better wording that I can't come up with > right now :-) ? Of course a router for the blind should do its best to > avoid such a way, while a regular pedestrian router could penalize the > way but route on it if needed.
Exactly. There's no reason to put this into the map. foot=not_preferred would be redundant. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
