On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:26 AM, David Paleino <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:19:49 +0200, David Paleino wrote: >> >>> However, I'm using that because I consider "Foo Avenue" as a logical unit, a >>> "route", even if the way is split (because of oneways, different >>> classifications, different tags, whatever). >> >> See, for example: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/143031 >> >> That's a street with different classifications, a oneway-segment, and a >> dual-carriageway one. > > No, I know what you're grouping. It's the why that I'm unsure about. > Where's the benefit in this relation?
You can link to it (like he just did). And you can more easily add/remove/change tags which apply to the street as a whole. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
