Hi, Martin, Sorry that I have not mentioned that the proposal isn't mine (I am nothing here but a translator) and I am not really eager to discuss it. So perhaps it would be better if the discussion took place at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather. Thank you.
2010/9/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > 2010/9/6 Dmitry Granovsky <[email protected]>: >> Hello, >> >> Here is the proposal originating from Russia: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather. >> >> Basically, it involves splitting surface=unpaved into two more >> specific categories (more details on the proposal page). Your comments >> are welcome on the discussion page: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather. >> >> I am not sure whether I should cross-post this to t...@. Feel free to >> forward this message there if necessary. > > > IMHO surface=paved/unpaved are to be considered deprecated. Please use > more specific values (asphalt, dirt, cobblestone, etc.), see your page > for some of the suggested values (e.g. I don't agree in all > categorization you did, IMHO grass_paver is a paved value, but it > doesn't matter as long as you tag what is there): > (your own list): > * paved > o asphalt > o cobblestone > o concrete > o metal > o paving_stones > * unpaved (not recommended) > o all_weather > + compacted > + gravel > + pebblestone > + grass_paver > + wood > o ground > + earth > + mud > + grass > + sand > + dirt > o ice_road > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Best regards, Dmitry V. Granovsky _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
