On Sunday 12 September 2010 19:39:01 Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote: > Richard Welty <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9/12/10 12:29 PM, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote: > > > If we really need a tag to indicate river flow, it can't be oneway. > > > And if we define a tag for flow, how would you define the direction, > > > what would be the reference ? > > > > you'd want it to work with respect to the direction of the way, as > > is done with oneway. > > > > a waterflow=* tag would probably look very much like oneway, > > with -1 for flow which is the reverse of the direction of > > the way. > > So the reference for direction would be the direction (drawing) of he > way. It would be close to what it's now as it's this drawing direction > that should indicate the flow. > But it would be explicit.
And then you would only tag the special cases. We don't put oneway=no on every road either. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
