On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:45 PM, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22 September 2010 06:45, Sean Horgan <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've heard others suggest updating the current tag, such as >> "amenity=disused". > > The only problem with that is it would obscure any amenities that may > have been damaged that they're planning to fix etc, I'd stick with > disused=yes so you know what was/is going to be there.
In keeping with the way of tagging under construction/proposed highways, you could use disused=[former amenity value]. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
