2010/10/4 Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>: > According to the wiki, landuse=greenfield "Describes land scheduled > for new development where there have been no buildings before". Does > this mean that any undeveloped land owned by a developer or zoned as > planned development is a greenfield?
I would say any land zoned as planned development (land where there is a right to build). I don't see a point in tagging land "owned by a developer" but where there is no right to build, as such. > If so, should a bug be filed on > trac to render it less obtrusively than the construction/brownfield > brown? probably yes. I think there can be a huge difference between actual constructions and a piece of land where maybe in the future there will be build. > Also, what if land with another landuse like farm is scheduled for new > development? Generally I'd say that the actual landuse (here landuse=farmyard) overrules in such cases the plans, but otherwise you would have 2 options: - draw another time the exactly same geometry (or use 2 multipolygons without inner in case there is no holes) and tag one as farmyard, the other one as brownfield or use landuse=farmyard;brownfield actually I put brownfield because there is already a building (seems to fit to the wiki definition), but I'm not sufficiently familiar with anglo-saxon construction terminology to decide whether this is the right term in this context. I'd personally prefer option 1 (separate objects with multipolygons) because it allows for better association of other details like name etc. which might well differ. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging