2010/10/7 Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]>: > I like it. Presumably it's to be precise - you draw only the area > that's covered by said landcover, as opposed to landuse which can > include small amounts of others within its boundaries.
+1 The following > landuse values should then be landcover: > *basin (probably) no, that should be water > *forest (most uses, but some such as national forests should remain landuse) no, I would make this tree. Use landuse=forest for what you want to describe > *grass +1 > *meadow no, that's grass > *orchard no > *reservoir no, that's water I think there is a misconception here: I don't want to abolish landuse, I want to add landcover additionally to describe the actual physical landcover. If there is for example landuse (or natural) = beach landcover could be sand or rock or pebbles cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
