On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's any benefit in mapping "paper streets" - > streets that have been officially dedicated to the government by the > former landowner but that have not (yet) been constructed. For > example, they may explain a truncated grid > (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.39687&lon=-81.50172&zoom=17&layers=M > ) > or two disconnected streets having the same name, and they are often > used in legal land descriptions. > > Some of these qualify for highway=proposed. But if there are no > current plans to build them, would it be a good idea to map them as > (for example) highway=paper name=*? > > If you read this diary entry: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/djwright7101/diary/12027 there is a strong opposition about imaginary cities. But it seems that imaginary roads are tolerated... Pieren
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
