Hi.
I think, that's a good point.
As social_facility has a relatively widespread meaning across the
entities it is used for, I think, it's useless to filter the data for
amenity=social_facility, because nobody will use that not filtered or
sorted further.
It's similar simple to filter for social_facility=*, and therefore that
should be enough. social_facility is not ambiguous conflicting with
other *=social_facility for interpretation as a subtag.
That in mind: +1 from me for optional amenity=social_facility
regards
Peter
On 21.10.2010 23:27, Sean Horgan wrote:
Hello again everyone.
The last day of voting for the Social Facility proposal is tomorrow,
22 Oct. The proposal can be found on the wiki here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_facility
With 13 votes, 12 for and 1 against, it looks like we are 2 votes away
from the community recommended 15 for approval.
User Hasemann raised a good point concerning the use of
amenity=social_facility. Personally, I'm fine with making the use of
amenity an optional but recommended tag instead of required. Would
such a change to the proposal change anyone's votes? What is the
recommended process for making changes to an approved feature?
I'm going to send out a separate email on the amenity issue.
Thanks.
Sean
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:35, Sean Horgan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ok, sounds good. I just bumped the date to the end of next week.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 05:55, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
2010/10/10 Sean Horgan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Hello everyone!
> The original deadline for voting on the social facility
proposal has just
> passed. The page can be found here:
>
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_facility
> We received 4 approvals (2 of those from the authors) and 1
in opposition.
> We've tried to address concerns in the Discussion page and
we've updated
> the proposal based on feedback from email.
> Based on the proposed feature process
>
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features#Proposal_status_process),
> we should aim for 15 total votes. Could people on this list
take a few
> minutes to either cast their vote or note their objections?
> Thanks to everyone for their help to this point.
I would set a new deadline on the Wiki (say +14 days), to make
it clearer.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
