Peter Budny wrote: > If you want this to be the standard way of tagging things, then we > NEED to get the tools up to spec. I also noticed that Potlatch > doesn't change the role from forward to backward when you > reverse a way. (JOSM does the right thing, though.)
Patches welcome. I'm not saying that as the standard snide answer to everything - I really mean it. As people have been developing more and more intricate uses of relations, the barrier to entry for new mappers gets higher, so yes, someone needs to upgrade the tools to cope. And I'm not happy with being the sole point of responsibility every time someone devises a new rule for use of relations. In particular P1's relations code needs: - content-sensitive behaviour (like reversing forward/backward roles, and only carrying through turn restrictions to the relevant ways in case of split) - relation ordering support - super-relation support Yell if you need any help getting to grips with the P1 source. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Super-relations-or-not-was-Relation-member-roles-from-Osmosis-import-tp5682868p5693945.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
