2010/11/13 Ulf Lamping <[email protected]>: > Am 13.11.2010 12:04, schrieb Morten Kjeldgaard: > How is landcover=trees any more helpful then widely used landuse / > natural?!?
in the case of landuse: landuse=residential, landcover trees ? Or natural=beach, landcover trees? Landuse is the _usage_ of an area. > How is landcover orthogonal to landuse / natural? landuse is the usage of the land, natural is used to denote features like summits, cave entrances, beaches, bays, ... > BTW: There is *no* benefit of a new landcover tag compared to existing tags. this is your opinion, I say the contrary. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
