2010/11/22 Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com>: > Am 22.11.2010 22:28, schrieb "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]": > Sure, there are tags that you could call deprecated, highway=minor would be > an example - no one would actually encourage to use this tag any more.
well, the wiki does, it says: under way (at least it did until now). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway:minor > But - simply because some people written a proposal and voted upon it, > doesn't automatically deprecate the former widely used tag. how else should we ever come to a conclusion, if we start mapping as we like and decide to only later evaluate if the initial decision and classification was useful? I do agree that this is a good way to rapidly develop tags and move on, but I don't agree that the outcome should never be structured later (because that will obviously mean to change "well established" tags). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging