Why: fortification_type=hill_fort
Better is: fortification:type=hill_fort
-Robert-
Citeren Johan Jönsson <[email protected]>:
Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@...> writes:
In practice, lot's of sites have *several* different "roots" throughout
the ages.
A castle may be build in early medieval ages, continuously extended
throughout those ages, largely changed in the baroque era and mostly
rebuild after damages of the second world war. Oh, and all of that on
top of a hill that was already populated in the celtic age.
How do you tag that?
Regards, ULFL
I am not used to these fancy namespacing tags, but they look useful.
I guess it
would be something like this:
-----
building=yes
building:architecture=baroque
historic:castle
historic:civilization:Celtic, Anglo-Saxon
historic:civilization:period:bronze age, early medieval, baroque, post-war
-----
or is it:
------
building=yes
building:architecture=baroque
historic:castle
historic:civilization:Celtic
historic:civilization:Celtic:period:bronze age
historic:civilization:Anglo-Saxon
historic:civilization:Anglo-Saxon:period:early medieval, baroque, post-war
------
It is probably the most visible or prominent remains that should be
tagged. The
Celtic hill fort is probably at the most an archaeological site. I guess that
the archaeological site could be tagged separately, either as a
single node or
as an area. Do not tag if not visible.
-----
building=yes
building:architecture=baroque
historic:castle
historic:civilization:Anglo-Saxon
historic:civilization:period: early medieval, baroque, post-war
historic=archaeological_site
site_type=fortification
fortification_type=hill_fort
historic:civilization:Celtic
historic:civilization:period:bronze age
-----
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
