boundary=protected_area seems to have established a strong de facto status, and boundary=national_park + boundary:type=protected_area seems to be the compromise taken to get things to render.
In the interest of providing more meaningful data about public lands in the US I'm planning to apply the following tags to US National Forests and National Parks: National Forest: boundary=national_park boundary:type=protected_area protect_id=6 protection_title=National Forest protected=perpetuity operator=United States Forest Service ownership=national National Park: boundary=national_park boundary:type=protected_area protect_id=2 protection_title=National Park protected=perpetuity operator=United States National Park Service ownership=national Also, there are a lot of national forests that we don't have outlines for, for these I was planning to tag the nodes with: protected_area=yes protect_id=6 protection_title=National Forest protected=perpetuity operator=United States Forest Service ownership=national Are there any objections to this? Other info that you think should be added as well? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
