On 2/15/2011 7:52 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com>:
-1,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer


our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for
every opinion ;-)

I don't have a big problem with layer=0 being considered "ground
level", but before someone wrote it on the key page the consensus was
that layers do only express relative order, not an absolute position.

I suggest we agree on one version and correct the other one.

Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to