On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > I proposed "rank" for places and it could be used for other stuff as > well (I actually already mentioned airports and rivers in the > proposal). The scale I proposed sets 0 as most prominent and could > initially augment in steps of 10 (so 10 would be next, then 20, ...), > allowing for finer detail later (in the intermediate levels).
Sounds good, too, although I would think counting up for higher importance would be marginally more intuitive. But I'm easy. Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
