I would think that if this was a good idea and it went forward, you would want to require an additional tag to cite the law/regulation/ordinance that has been violated. (and a link to the online dossier with all of the evidence and data?...)
I think that this tag is not a good idea. David. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:02 PM, yvecai <yve...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08. 03. 11 12:00, grin wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Your valuable input is welcome and would be much appreciated. >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal >> >> Thanks, >> [[user:grin]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > Hmm, I can imagine edit wars by lawyers ... > Otherwise illegal=yes/no sounds OK, but landuse I'm not sure. > landuse=landfill + illegal=yes would be sufficient, I guess. > > Yves > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
