> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:41:12 -0400 > From: Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks > > I think the number of tags in this kind of proposal would balloon > quickly, so let me suggest instead that tags of this nature be put on > the changeset, with a then request to bot authors to check object > history and changesets, rather than more tags on the object. > > In other words, use the changeset to hold this (what I think of as) > metadata, rather than the object itself.
i don't understand on how that would be the case. after execution of the task the corresponding tag gets deleted anyway since they are only temporarily. i can't see on how changesets should be better. you would have to start a changeset per deadline and that's even more complicated, since it cannot be done easily within tag editors. also fellow mappers would never know that someone else already has a changeset prepared, since mostly people check the tags only. flaimo _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
