something like that should be handled in a seperate proposal, though i think most of your examples are covered with addr:housename.
flaimo > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:36:39 +0200 > From: M?rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr keys (2011-04) > Message-ID: <banlktiml-_p8ayomvpgg26jjydfmcoo...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Yes. You are currently concentrating on the micro level, but there > could be a suggestion for the intermediate scale between the whole > complex and the micro level as well: de:"Hof" (engl. "courtyard") > > This is often also expressed indirectly in addresses with the German > terms "Seitenfl?gel" (side wing), "Vorderhaus" (front building), > "Hinterhaus" (rear building), "2. Hinterhaus" (second rear building = > 2nd courtyard rear building), etc.) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
