> Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:49:43 +0200 > From: fly <[email protected]> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - shelter type > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Please, do not mix hunting_stands with shelter. > > Many hunting_stands do not even have a roof nor walls. > Many are only reached by climbing up a latter.
hunting stand is just an example someone gave in the comments. it is not really part of the proposal. if approved i probably won't put it on the dedicated wiki page. > shelter=yes or shelter=* could be a solution to think about. that won't work. shelter=yes is already a sidecar tag mapped on an element with another main key, that is not a shelter (like highway=platform for example) to indicate that there is a shelter somewhere, but cannot be exactly pinpointed (because for lack of satellite images). i can't just go and give it a completely different meaning of a refinement tag for an element mapped with amenity=shelter. that is also one of the reasons why i didn't use "recycling" in my recycling_type proposal. flaimo _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
