It might be worth discussing about life-cycle tagging in general and not just for buildings. There are a few life-cycle tagging proposals in the Wiki.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Mihkel Rämmel <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to know weather the building life cycle would be > something like this: > *building=construction (600 uses) > *building=yes or a more specific building=* tag > *building=yes disused=yes (1700 uses) > *building=yes abandoned=yes (800 uses) > *building=collapsed(9000 uses) or *building=yes ruins=yes > > If it is not right then please correct me. > > Would building=yes ruins=yes (3000 uses) and building=ruins (850 > uses) mean the same? Which one would be better to use? > > Would it be reasonable to add these tags to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Building ? Not into the main table > where building=collapsed is currently, but as a separate table below. > > I uploaded some pictures to http://web.zone.ee/rmihkel87/buildings/ > for discussing where the border between disused, abandoned, collapsed > and ruins goes. Although I didn't find any good picture for disused > building. > > Mihkel _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
